The Pluralism Project at Harvard University
Asian Immigration Debate Evaluation
Western Expansion/Hajduk/Fall 2000
Debate:
| Evidence of using class time effectively to work on project | 10 pts | |
| Delivery of speech: clear, talked not read, prepared and organized | 10 pts | |
| Substance of argument or response, appropriate and relevant | 15 pts | |
| Typed and detailed outline from entire group | 15 pts |
Paper:
| Written in the spirit of assigned position and demonstrated strength in position's argument | 10 pts | |
| Uniqueness of argument | 10 pts | |
| Substance of argument: details and examples | 20 pts | |
| Grammar, spelling, syntax | 10 pts | |
| Formal bibliography | 10 pts |
Paper Total: /100